US Supreme Court’s Revolutionary Ruling in Campaign Finance Law

The Saint ReportPoliticians and Planning, saintblog, Uncategorized0 Comments

By Jeffrey Gould, Vice President & General Counsel, The Saint Consulting Group

In a 5-4 ruling, the US Supreme Court held on January 21, 2010 that corporations may spend freely to support or oppose presidential and congressional candidates, ending a decades-old limit on their participation in federal campaigns.  The ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission also removes the prohibition on political spending by unions and other organizations.

Citing unconstitutional restriction on freedom of speech considerations, Justice Kennedy, writing for the majority, noted that “Our nation’s speech dynamic is changing, and informative voices should not have to circumvent onerous restrictions to exercise their First Amendment rights.”  The conservative-led opinion dramatically alters the campaign finance landscape and gives greater flexibility to nonprofit and for-profit groups when it comes to political advertising.

Additionally, the Citizens United decision, with its allowance of unlimited independent expenditures from corporate treasuries, invalidates the McCain-Feingold law that barred expenditures within 60 days of a general election and three days of a primary, allowing corporations and unions to directly advocate through the Election Day.

The opinion, however, leaves in place prohibitions on direct contributions to candidates from corporations and unions, as well as current disclaimer and disclosure requirements for communications.  Additionally, the decision will almost certainly allow labor unions to participate more freely in campaigns, threatening the limits imposed by 24 states. 

The case does not affect political action committees (PACs), which have grown in number in recent years as a means for corporations, unions and others to contribute directly to candidates.  PACs, however, must be funded by voluntary contributions from employees and members, not by corporate or union treasuries.

This decision will impact the laws of states and localities, in that the restrictive provisions of state laws will now be unconstitutional under the First Amendment.  As a result, Tennessee and Massachusetts have already filed legislation that would change state restrictions on corporate spending in campaigns, in an effort to bring state laws in line with the USSC decision in Citizens United

Jeffrey Gould is general counsel and vice president of The Saint Consulting Group, email gould@tscg.biz phone 781 749 7920, ext 7115

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *